Plot well-known geometry vectors

wk_plot(
  handleable,
  ...,
  asp = 1,
  bbox = NULL,
  xlab = "",
  ylab = "",
  rule = "evenodd",
  add = FALSE
)

# S3 method for default
wk_plot(
  handleable,
  ...,
  asp = 1,
  bbox = NULL,
  xlab = "",
  ylab = "",
  rule = "evenodd",
  add = FALSE
)

# S3 method for wk_wkt
plot(
  x,
  ...,
  asp = 1,
  bbox = NULL,
  xlab = "",
  ylab = "",
  rule = "evenodd",
  add = FALSE
)

# S3 method for wk_wkb
plot(
  x,
  ...,
  asp = 1,
  bbox = NULL,
  xlab = "",
  ylab = "",
  rule = "evenodd",
  add = FALSE
)

# S3 method for wk_xy
plot(x, ..., asp = 1, bbox = NULL, xlab = "", ylab = "", add = FALSE)

# S3 method for wk_rct
plot(x, ..., asp = 1, bbox = NULL, xlab = "", ylab = "", add = FALSE)

# S3 method for wk_crc
plot(x, ..., asp = 1, bbox = NULL, xlab = "", ylab = "", add = FALSE)

Arguments

handleable

A geometry vector (e.g., wkb(), wkt(), xy(), rct(), or sf::st_sfc()) for which wk_handle() is defined.

...

Passed to plotting functions for features: graphics::points() for point and multipoint geometries, graphics::lines() for linestring and multilinestring geometries, and graphics::polypath() for polygon and multipolygon geometries.

asp, xlab, ylab

Passed to graphics::plot()

bbox

The limits of the plot as a rct() or compatible object

rule

The rule to use for filling polygons (see graphics::polypath())

add

Should a new plot be created, or should handleable be added to the existing plot?

x

A wkb() or wkt()

Value

The input, invisibly.

Examples

plot(as_wkt("LINESTRING (0 0, 1 1)"))
plot(as_wkb("LINESTRING (0 0, 1 1)"))